Troubleshooting guide

EMI gasket failure modes: why a gasket that shielded stops, and how to tell which mode

An EMI gasket that shielded on day one stops for one of six reasons: galvanic corrosion at the flange, loss of contact pressure through compression set and relaxation, tearing or extrusion of the elastomer, loss of conductivity in the filler with heat, salt fog or cycling, an installation error that was there from the start, or a fastener spacing that lets the seam radiate between bolts [S9][S5][S15]. Each mode leaves its own evidence at the joint, so the mode can usually be read before any shielding re-test [S9][S18]. This guide gives the modes in one table with symptom, cause and the check that separates them, then the measured data behind each mode, and a diagnosis order. Where the numbers are disputed or missing, the page says so. Conquest Seal supplies conductive elastomer gaskets and O-rings made by manufacturers on the relevant qualified products list, where the document has one, and quotes the replacement to the specification on your existing drawing.

The modes in one table

Each row names the mode, what you see, what caused it and the check that confirms it; the sections that follow carry the data.

EMI gasket failure modes: symptom, cause and the confirming check, from the sources cited
ModeSymptomCauseCheckSource
Galvanic corrosion at the flangeWhite or gray corrosion product at the flange edge and under the gasket footprint on aluminum; pitting; rising gasket-to-flange resistanceDissimilar filler and flange plus an electrolyte (salt spray, condensed humidity); a filler with high measured weight loss on aluminum, an unsealed edge, a bare flangeFlange-to-gasket resistance; the filler against the coupon data; the finish against MIL-DTL-5541 Class 3; edge seal present or not[S9][S5][S18]
Loss of contact pressureGasket no longer springs back to groove depth; flattened footprint at the bolts with a slack stretch between them; shielding fails at the lowest-pressure point between fastenersCompression set from over-compression or heat; stress relaxation; bolts that lost torque in cold service or vibration; cover bowing; tolerance stack-upFree height against groove depth and the deflection window; bolt-adjacent versus mid-span footprint; torque; compression stops present[S9][S30]
Tearing, extrusion or blow-outSplit or nicked cross-section; flash extruded at the groove edge after assembly; material missing at bolt holes on flat gasketsGasket too tall for the minimum groove; over-filled groove at worst-case tolerances; gas pressure too high for the gap; holes closer to an edge than the sheet thickness; corner radius too smallGroove fill at worst case; hole and web distances; corner radii; free height against groove depth[S9][S15]
Conductivity loss with timeRising volume or contact resistance against the sheet's as-supplied and aged ceilings; tarnished silver; hard oxide at a Monel® or aluminum contact; loss that tracks exposure, not assemblyFiller oxidation and heat aging; salt fog on nickel-bearing grades; compression cycling; sulfur exposure in storage; the wrong cleaning agentFour-point or two-point resistance against the datasheet ceilings; exposure history; storage and cleaning record[S9][S15][S14]
Installation errorShielding poor from the first test; adhesive or paint on the contact face; twisted or rolled gasket; damaged fingersNon-conductive adhesive on the conductive face; paint or overspray on the mating face; no groove and no stop; groove bottom too smooth or with circumferential chatter; splice radius too smallVisual at the joint before anything else; the drawing note on masking and adhesive placement[S9][S35]
Fastener spacing near a half wavelengthSeam radiates at the top frequency from the low-pressure stretch between bolts although the material tests fineBolt spacing approaching half a wavelength at the highest frequency of interest; pressure between bolts too lowSpacing against half a wavelength; pressure rise of 20 percent (64 at wider spacing) at the low point[S9]

Galvanic corrosion at the flange

The handbook states the three conditions as a battery: two unlike metals, an electrical path between them, and an electrolyte able to dissolve the less noble one; a gasket between aluminum or steel flanges supplies the first two by nature, salt spray or condensed humidity supplies the third, and corrosion scales with the total galvanic current [S9]. MIL-STD-889D describes accelerated attack on the anodic member at a rate set by the galvanic current, and its compatibility criterion is a calculated anodic corrosion rate of at most 0.009 mil per year in seawater, with anything above requiring protection and compatibility not excluding crevice or pitting corrosion [S5]. The handbook's 168 hour salt fog coupon test on 6061-T6 aluminum gave weight losses of 2.2 mg for passivated silver-aluminum fluorosilicone, 19 and 22 mg for the other silver-aluminum grades, 37 mg for silver-glass, 167 mg for a nickel-graphite grade, 237 mg for pure silver and 281 mg for silver-copper, with nickel powder and nickel fiber at 25.5 and 10.3 mg and carbon at 35.2 mg [S9]. In the same test silver-bearing grades stayed near 7 milliohm-cm before and after while nickel-bearing grades rose from tens to hundreds of milliohm-cm, and one rose past 1000 [S9]. Newer nickel-aluminum fillers report the opposite ranking, up to twice the galvanic corrosion resistance of silver-aluminum in salt spray testing on one manufacturer's page and the best result in the 504 hour salt fog testing that led NASA to select it; this is the disputed point, because nickel powder in 2000 and nickel-plated aluminum today are different fillers, and the modern claim is limited to that filler [S32][S18][S9].

Diagnosis is white or gray corrosion product at the flange edge and under the footprint, pitting of the flange face, a rise in gasket-to-flange resistance, and a fall in shielding that the NASA protocol tracks by re-measuring shielding effectiveness at fixed frequencies after exposure [S18]. Corrosion potentials in 5 percent sodium chloride put Monel mesh at -125 mV against a saturated calomel electrode, close to silver at -25 and far from aluminum at -730, which is why Monel's corrosion resistance refers to its own oxidation and not to its compatibility with aluminum, and why it needs extensive edge sealing there [S9]. The pairing rules and the finish table are on the galvanic compatibility guide.

Flange pretreatment under salt fog and humidity

NASA's chrome-free coating study is the reference case for the flange side of the joint: hexavalent chromate pretreatment was known to lose shielding effectiveness after environmental testing, and the question was whether chrome-free Type II coatings would do better or worse [S18]. The exposures were 100 thermal cycles from 0 to 100 C, ASTM B117 salt spray for 168 and then 1008 hours, 1000 hours at 85 C and 85 percent relative humidity, and twelve months of beachfront marine exposure, with shielding from 50 MHz to 18 GHz at three frequencies per decade before and after, plus contact and surface resistance [S18]. The slides show no pitting on 5052-H32 with either the hexavalent or the chrome-free coating at six weeks of salt spray; the consolidated post-exposure shielding plots are images and their values are not quoted here [S18]. ASTM B117 itself warns that salt spray results seldom correlate with natural environments when used alone, and MIL-STD-810H Method 509.7 is the DoD counterpart [S28][S29].

Compression set and loss of contact pressure

Rubber deformed for a time keeps some of the deformation; the handbook defines compression set as the retained deformation expressed as a percentage of the initial deflection per ASTM D395 Method B, with the worked example that 30 percent set at 25 percent deflection means 92.5 percent recovery of the free height [S9][S30]. Over-compression accelerates it, and flanges that bow between bolts over-compress the gasket at the bolts [S9]. Stress relaxation is the companion effect: the load falls to about 70 to 75 percent of its initial value within an hour as the polymer rearranges [S9]. Published set values run 25 to 35 percent for most silver and nickel grades at 70 hours and 100 C, 45 to 60 percent for pure-silver and carbon grades in the November 2000 handbook, and 40 to 50 percent on the EPDM rows of one catalog [S15][S14][S11][S9]. All-metal knitted mesh takes a set, so TE advises against frequent opening; beryllium-copper fingerstock shows none within its working range but is damaged by over-compression [S34][S35].

Loss of contact pressure lowers shielding, and plane-wave attenuation is the most pressure-sensitive; for a gasket that is opened and reseated the handbook's rule is that the change in gasket thickness must not exceed twice the maximum mismatch between the mating surfaces [S9]. Under-deflection from tolerance stack-up, cover bowing and non-conformity can end in complete loss of cover-to-gasket contact over time [S9]. The signs are a gasket that no longer springs back to its groove depth, a flattened footprint at bolt locations with a slack stretch between them, shielding that fails at the lowest-pressure point between fasteners, and bolts that have lost torque in cold service or under vibration [S9]. The remedy is groove control or compression stops, torque to the relaxation factor, closer fasteners or stiffer flanges, all on the design guide [S9].

Tearing, extrusion and rupture

Conductive elastomers have low tensile and tear strength, with tensile minima of 80 to 600 psi and tear minima of 20 to 75 pounds per inch on the tables, so the handbook limits elongation to under 10 percent in service, warns that tall gaskets roll over when loaded, and states that a solid elastomer cannot change volume, so an over-filled groove damages the gasket [S9][S15]. Its worst-case figures name three damage routes: a gasket too tall for the minimum groove depth (deflection past the elastic limit, fracture), a maximum gasket in a minimum groove (over-fill, damage), and gas pressure too high for the gap (blow-out) [S9]. Waveguide gaskets creep into the opening unless reinforced with expanded metal, compression stops prevent rupture where compression is uncontrolled, and the soft 30 to 45 Shore A grades are called out for low tear strength [S9]. The signs are a split or nicked cross-section, flash extruded at the groove edge after assembly, and material missing at bolt holes on flat gaskets where the holes sat closer to an edge than the sheet thickness [S9].

Conductivity loss with time

Oxides on most metals are hard and insulating, and silver's are soft and conductive, which is why the specification has a heat-aging test and why every manufacturer table lists a resistivity ceiling after aging above the as-supplied ceiling [S9][S15]. The published pairs: 0.010 to 0.015 ohm-cm after aging for silver grades against 0.004 to 0.012 as supplied; 0.250 for nickel-graphite against 0.100; 0.200 to 0.250 for nickel-aluminum against 0.150 to 0.250, with the aging conditions per grade given as 48 hours at 100, 150 or 200 C, or 1000 hours at 125 C [S15][S14]. Fabric-over-foam surface resistivity rose from 0.009 to 0.014 ohm per square after 168 hours at 85 C, and from 0.007 to 0.017 after 168 hours at 121 C, and compression cycling raised a fabric gasket's resistance from 0.006 to 0.032 ohm over 10,000 cycles at 50 percent deflection [S9]. In salt fog the nickel-bearing grades lose conductivity and the silver-bearing grades hold, which is the handbook's stated conclusion [S9]. Silver migration under humidity and bias is documented in electronics generally but no source read gives data for it in gasket elastomers, so it is not quantified here; the handbook's silver-specific handling note is to store silver-bearing grades away from sulfur-bearing materials such as sulfur-cured neoprene and cardboard, and to clean with water or alcohol and mild soap, never aromatic or chlorinated solvents [S9].

Fluids act on the binder rather than the filler: Laird®'s fluid table rates silicone poor in DS-2 decontaminant and not for use in concentrated acids and bases, where EPDM is rated fair to good on acids and good on bases, and silicone is not for use with hydrocarbon fuels, where fluorosilicone is rated good [S11]. No manufacturer figure for the effect of cleaning agents on gasket shielding was found in the sources read, so none is quoted. The check is a four-point or two-point resistance reading against the sheet's as-supplied and aged ceilings, a look for tarnished silver or hard oxide at a Monel or aluminum contact, and a shielding loss that tracks exposure rather than assembly [S15][S9].

Installation errors

These are the errors the handbook names, most of them visible at the joint before any test.

Installation errors and what each one does, from the November 2000 handbook unless another source is given
ErrorWhat happensSource
Over-compression: no groove, no stop, bolts too tightCompression set accelerates; the elastomer ruptures; fingerstock fingers are damaged; excessive bolt preload can itself cause RF leakage[S9][S35]
Wrong groove: too shallow, too narrow, over-filled at tolerance stackDeflection past the elastic limit or groove over-fill; gasket damage or fracture[S9]
Groove too deep or wide; cover bowingUnder-deflection below 10 percent; loss of contact with time[S9]
Adhesive on the contact faceSerious degradation of shielding; adhesive must be restricted to the non-EMI portion, and the assumption that a fully bonded gasket holds better is named as the mistake[S9]
Paint or overspray on the mating faceAn insulating film at the junction; mask before painting, add a drawing note, clean after[S9]
Groove bottom too smooth, or with circumferential chatterThe gasket rolls or twists; leakage along the groove under pressure[S9]
Splice corner radius too smallTwisting of the section; a solid O needs a corner radius at least the section width, extrusions 2.5 times the strip width[S9]
Flat gasket holes too close to an edge, webs too narrowTearing at assembly[S9]
Mesh combination strip where only one half touches both flangesEither the seal or the shield is lost[S9]
Sponge-core mesh in a wet locationWicks moisture; the MIL-STD-1250 advice quoted in the handbook says do not use hygroscopic materials[S9]
Monel or silver mesh on aluminum without an edge sealGalvanic attack; the MIL-STD-1250 advice quoted in the handbook requires an environmental seal or sealant bead[S9]
Fasteners spaced near a half wavelength at the top frequencyThe seam radiates from the low-pressure stretch between bolts[S9]

Repeated door openings

A door or panel opened often is the case where form matters more than material. Beryllium-copper fingerstock gives a wiping contact and shows no set within its working range, but over-compression damages the fingers [S35][S17]. All-metal knitted mesh takes a set, so TE advises against frequent panel opening with it [S34]. The handbook's fabric-over-foam data show resistance rising from 0.006 to 0.032 ohm over 10,000 cycles at 50 percent deflection, a measured aging figure rather than a failure [S9]. For an elastomer gasket that is reseated, the rule is that the change in gasket thickness must not exceed twice the maximum mismatch between the mating surfaces, and the forms guide sets the seven forms side by side [S9].

Diagnosis order

The checks the handbook and datasheets describe, starting at the joint:

  1. Check the joint, not the gasket: measure flange-to-gasket resistance and look for paint, chromate damage, corrosion product and oxide; the handbook ranks junction conductivity first [S9].
  2. Check compression: measure free height against groove depth and the deflection window for the profile; compare bolt-adjacent and mid-span footprints; verify torque and that stops exist [S9].
  3. Check the material's electrical state against the sheet: as-supplied, aged and post-vibration resistivity ceilings [S15][S14].
  4. Check the exposure history: salt fog, humidity, fuel against the binder, cleaning agents, and temperature above the grade's continuous limit [S11][S15].
  5. Only then re-test shielding, remembering that the fixture value never equals the flange value and that a real enclosure can only be assessed by testing it [S15][S9].

The material ceilings are on the conductive elastomers page, the type letters on the MIL-DTL-83528 guide, and the test methods on the testing guide. Send a photo of the joint with the drawing and the exposure history through the request a quote form. Name the filler or MIL-DTL-83528 type letter your drawing calls out, and the quote comes with the maker's datasheet.

Measured values on this page are the cited handbook, datasheet and NASA figures; where a number is disputed or missing the text says so.

Frequently asked questions

What are the failure modes of EMI gaskets over time?

Six: galvanic corrosion at the flange when a dissimilar filler meets salt spray or humidity, loss of contact pressure through compression set and stress relaxation, tearing or extrusion from an over-filled or under-sized groove, loss of conductivity as the filler oxidizes with heat or salt fog, installation errors such as adhesive or paint on the contact face, and a fastener spacing near a half wavelength that lets the seam radiate between bolts; each leaves its own evidence at the joint [S9][S5][S15].

What is the shelf life of conductive silicone gaskets?

No source read states it as a number; the handbook gives storage advice instead, keep silver-bearing grades away from sulfur-bearing materials such as sulfur-cured neoprene and cardboard and clean them with water or alcohol and mild soap, so ask for the compound's shelf-life statement with the quote [S9].

Do conductive elastomer gaskets lose conductivity after compression set?

The set itself lowers contact pressure rather than conductivity, and the datasheets separate the two: compression set of 25 to 35 percent at 70 hours and 100 C for most silver and nickel grades, and resistivity ceilings after heat aging, during and after vibration and after EMP exposure that hold within a stated limit; a loss of shielding after set is a pressure problem first, fixed by groove control, stops or torque [S15][S14][S9].

How do EMI gaskets handle repeated door openings and closings?

Fingerstock best, with a wiping contact and no set within its working range; all-metal mesh takes a set and is not advised for frequent opening; fabric-over-foam showed resistance rising from 0.006 to 0.032 ohm over 10,000 cycles at 50 percent deflection; an elastomer gasket that is reseated must not change thickness by more than twice the surface mismatch [S35][S34][S9].

Why did shielding drop after salt fog exposure?

Either the flange corroded under the gasket, seen as white or gray product and pitting on aluminum, or a nickel-bearing filler lost conductivity, seen as resistivity rising from tens to hundreds of milliohm-cm in the handbook's test while silver-bearing grades stayed near 7; check the flange finish against MIL-DTL-5541 Class 3 and the filler against the coupon data [S9][S18].

How do I tell compression set from a groove problem?

Measure the free height of the removed gasket against its original and the groove depth against the drawing: a gasket that has lost height evenly while the groove is to print has taken a set (30 percent set at 25 percent deflection leaves 92.5 percent of the free height); a gasket flattened only at the bolts with the groove to print points to cover bowing or spacing; a groove out of print points to the design [S9][S30].

Sources

  1. [S5] MIL-STD-889D, Galvanic Compatibility of Electrically Conductive Materials, 21 July 2021 (title page and foreword; copy hosted by Corrdesa) - https://corrdesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MIL-STD-889D-2021-Release.pdf - accessed 2026-09-13
  2. [S9] Parker® Chomerics®, EMI Shielding Engineering Handbook, November 2000 edition (copy hosted by Sealing Devices) - https://sealingdevices.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CHO-HB.pdf - accessed 2026-09-13
  3. [S11] Laird, EMI Essentials: Introduction to Electrically Conductive Elastomers, material selection tables and case study (copy hosted by ATD) - http://www.atd-shop.com/www/prilohy/laird%20elastomers.pdf - accessed 2026-09-13
  4. [S14] 3G Shielding Specialties, Waveseal® conductive elastomer sheet stock datasheet (MIL-DTL-83528D type limits per material) - https://www.3gshielding.com/docs/3GSS%20Conductive%20Elastomer.pdf - accessed 2026-09-13
  5. [S15] Parker Chomerics, Conductive Elastomer Selection Guide, CHOC1029, June 2026 (the material guidelines table, form factors, test notes A to H; distributor copy) - https://www.hitek-ltd.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/CH5434-TDS.pdf - accessed 2026-09-14
  6. [S17] Tech-Etch, EMI/RFI Shielding Product Guide (fingerstock, fabric-over-foam, conductive foam, oriented wire) - https://techetch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Tech-Etch_Design_Guide_1-12_8P.pdf - accessed 2026-09-14
  7. [S18] NASA, Hexavalent Chrome Free Coatings for Electronics: Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding Effectiveness (SE), NTRS 20160006645 - https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160006645/downloads/20160006645.pdf - accessed 2026-09-14
  8. [S28] ASTM International, ASTM B117-19, Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus (store listing, scope) - https://store.astm.org/b0117-19.html - accessed 2026-09-14
  9. [S29] MIL-STD-810H, Method 509.7 Salt Fog, 31 January 2019 (third-party copy, header only) - https://cvgstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/MIL-STD-810H-Method-509.7-Salt-Fog.pdf - accessed 2026-09-14
  10. [S30] ASTM International, ASTM D395-18, Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property, Compression Set (store listing, scope) - https://store.astm.org/d0395-18.html - accessed 2026-09-14
  11. [S32] Specialty Silicone Products, 5G EMI Gaskets for Telecommunications (nickel-aluminum fluorosilicone 1 to 40 GHz data) - https://sspinc.com/5g-telecommunications-emi-gaskets/ - accessed 2026-09-14
  12. [S34] TE Connectivity, Knitted Wire Mesh EMI gaskets - https://www.te.com/en/products/emi-and-emc-solutions/emi-shielding/emi-gaskets/intersection/knitted-wire-mesh.html - accessed 2026-09-14
  13. [S35] TE Connectivity, Beryllium Copper Fingers - https://www.te.com/en/products/emi-and-emc-solutions/emi-shielding/resources/beryllium-copper-fingers.html - accessed 2026-09-14

Parker and Chomerics are trademarks of Parker Hannifin Corporation; Monel is a trademark of Special Metals Corporation; Laird and Waveseal are trademarks of their owners. No affiliation or endorsement is implied.

Send a photo of the joint with the drawing

A photo of the failed gasket and flange, the drawing or profile, the filler or type letter, the exposure history and the quantity. Name the filler or MIL-DTL-83528 type letter your drawing calls out, and the quote comes with the maker's datasheet. A Conquest representative replies.

Request a quote
Request a quote